JOIN OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER  

Facebook Twitter Instagram

How to run afoul of Occupy San Antonio, just ask too many questions

October 13, 2011

After Adbusters‘ Occupy Wall Street campaign went national, a San Antonio based contingent manifested. Social Justice leaders within the Bexar County are were skeptical of the ‘leaderless’ crowds. For years Social Justice scholars have studied historical protests. A leaderless movement? Could a fledgling group of dissenters in SA survive without infrastructure? And why hasn’t the park dwelling political independents, anarchists, socialists, libertarians, conservatives, and environmentalists reached out to local movement builders working on immigration, human rights, economic justice, women’s rights, and prison justice?

A good friend of mine donates her time and money all year long to help local community groups. As an award winning graphic designer she really doesn’t have a ton of time to give these days. The Occupy Wall Street message really resonates with her as a business owner. She gives a shit. Like so many, she joined one of the Occupy San Antonio Facebook groups to ask a simple question. Why did the Occupy San Antonio General Assembly apply for a DBA (doing-business-as) trade name? The question she posed, and the discussion that followed, was not welcomed.

Here are some screen shots of the discussion. In the end, the thread was deleted [censored] around 3AM.

UPDATED/EDIT: while it appeared the thread had been deleted at 3 am, it is in fact still on the OccupySa wall, and growing. I attribute this to Facebook being wonky…the entire thread that could be captured is posted below.

Tags: , , , , , ,

  • Hellpasopunkgrl

    I appreciate your one sidedness and failure to collect all facts before writing your blog.

  • maravillavuela

    Onesidedness? The attitude represented in the comments says it all. Absolutely pretentious and narrow minded. Where is the love in this revolution?

  • Hellpasopunkgrl

    And we are being censored by her now. How lovely.

  • Coffeyartist

    Much of this discussion has been edited.  I for one stood up for you guys and felt like I reached out to you.  I am sorry that you felt unwelcomed…and we have since dissolved our DBA (it was undertaken when some bad advice was given to us.  The group acknowledges it as a mistake, and it’s over.)  You imply that we are going  to fail because we are not allying ourselves with some groups that you believe would be helpful to us.  And yet, through public criticism, you pose a threat to us personally. If you really stand in allegiance with the ideas and demands of Occupy Wall Street (to which we adhere adamantly), please do not undermine what we are doing with negative venting in a public forum.  I am sorry that you don’t agree with our methods, but please understand that we truly want to do GOOD for our community and good for you.  As 99%ers, we want input and help from all sides.  Culling support from 99% of the people means that we are going to have a lot of diverse ideas and opinions.  And individual members of the group may not always agree with decisions arrived at by consensus.  But we can ALL agree with a few facts.  Banks are swallowing our money.  Corporations have achieved personhood, and thereby not only threaten our democracy but make a mockery out of our very humanity.  Politicians are in the pockets of said corporations.  And the super-wealthy are taxed for their capital gains at 1/5 the rate that we as average workers pay for our wages.  Let’s do what we can to fight these atrocities and leave wounded feelings out of the public eye.  I respect you as a person, I honor you as a citizen, and humbly ask you to reconsider your position. 

  • Nick

    I really like the “Media Justice” we are getting here. It really appears to me that you despite your misleading name have undertaken in a smear campaign. You where Invited to participate in the movement and refused to do so. You have spent no time among our members and have no idea who we are or what we are about. This is a real shame.

  • Nick

    As a member of OSA I feel that the posted blog is highly inaccurate. As a long time reader of The Current I have always had much more respect for this paper until today. Many of us are truly disappointed right now. The person who wrote this blog post has spent little to no time around our members. Despite the fact that she has been invited to more then a few meetings and Invited to participate in our group she has adamantly refused to do so. Instead she creates a domain on the web under our name and proceeds to inform us that she is going to “rebrand” our movement and has scheduled meetings claiming to represent us. When she was informed that no one had given her permission to represent us she essentially said she didn’t care she was going to do it anyway. Every time she has attended she has done nothing but comment on the racial and gender mix of the group and how it was not to her liking despite the fact that this group is one of the most diverse I have ever seen and the fact that we as a group focus on everyone being equal despite our differences. As I said previously I am highly disappointed in the current right now.
    For anyone reading this I would first suggest that you avoid Deannes domain. It is not Occupy San Antonio. Our official site is occupysatx.com. Secondly I would suggest that you come look for yourself. This persons account of the group 

  • mary

    This article is complete shit.

  • Anonymous

    The recent San Antonio Current article exposing the OccupySA movement’s acts of banning citizens was accurate but didn’t go far enough to expose the motives behind the actions of the “leaders” of a “leaderless” movement.

    KA is mentioned in the Facebook posting BUT her comments were not included.
    Look into KA and you will see a direct link to Councilman Diego M Bernal and
    efforts to hide public/police corruption inside our City.  

    During the second General Assembly meeting Mr. John E Foddrill Sr. distributed over 75 CDs and literature detailing public and police corruption inside our City.  He spoke to the room full of citizens from all across our City. He was warmly welcomed, obtained support of the group and joined the media group as a member of the movement.

     Within a few days information was published exposing city councilman Diego M Bernal as a major player in efforts by the City to hide the decades of fraud and theft. A single person inside the organization had ties to Bernal and took action to help hide the corruption and Bernal’s involvement. RP used his administrative access to delete entire forums, erase data and retool ALL websites to eliminate any trace of the corruption being researched for exposure to our citizens.

    Staunch Diego M Bernal supporters such as RC, KA, RP, SK, KG, RM began to join the movement and steer the group away from Bernal, the local
    corruption and City Hall.  They issued edicts declaring what kind of signs could be carried, slogans that were to be used, etc.  Any dissent was met with an
    on-line tongue lashing by the “leaders”.  Support efforts to expose local corruption and lawlessness and one was publicly defamed and banned. Information of the corruption or Bernal’s involvement was routinely
    deleted.

    Member John E Foddrill Sr. was threatened on-line and his family received a phone call at 3:01 AM on October 12. The recorded “Anonymous”
    voice (simulated voice used by the group Anonymous) warned Foddrill to stop
    trying to expose the corruption.  The FBI has been provided with this info.

    Documentation shows that Councilman Bernal has provided support for the movement and receives public accolades by- you guessed it – the core members of the movement who work at hiding the corruption, violations of law, illegal cover-up and Bernal’s involvement in the criminal activity.

    Megan Owen is named in the screenshot posted with the SA Current article. She, like John Foddrill joined the media group during the 2nd meeting. She has authored emails threatening legal action against Mr. Foddrill and indicating that the group has gone to the police in an effort to halt his efforts to expose Bernal and the city-wide corruption. In her emails Megan Owen states:   “I would like to
    personally thank those in power in the city for allowing us to try and make a
    difference both in our city and across the nation.”

    It would seem that our local movement “leaders” have made a pact with the Devil – the very devil the rest of us are fighting!

    Many of us inside the movement are working together to expose the secret agenda of our “leaders” , the public/police corruption and councilman Diego M Bernal’s participation in the whole sordid mess.

    Keep up the good work SA Current.

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    deanne enjoys the privilege of running a blog on our site to cover issues related to tech and social justice — and she’s done a good job with it. when i read this post, i see someone asking questions about occupy and the inclusion of a facebook thread with the sort of sniping that happens on myriad topics around the world and around the clock. it raises questions about the DBA, but doesn’t answer them. (the decision to delete the thread, unfortunately, is what stands out.) that said, the current’s responsibility is to make sure nothing is distributed by our staff and contributors that is untrue. i don’t see that happening here. it seems the substance of your complaint is about organizational issues and attitudinal differences between OSA and deanne that aren’t treated in this post. (if i’m anything like the average reader, i doubt any larger opinions or attitudes about the place and validity of the OSA movement will be swayed by it either. it’s insider baseball, for the most part, but raises the questions about how the group could and should function. if anything the reaction to it suggests a hyper-vigilance w/n the group about staying on message and avoiding the public airing of divergent views. that would seem contrary to the movement as i understand it.) i know deanne, who was with OSA for a good while yesterday, was asked to delete the post. we don’t delete posts at the current when they become controversial. that said: if there are errors or misrepresentations here that require followup (and i don’t think there are) they would be addressed in a correction on this post or in a followup post.

  • http://twitter.com/dcshortwave dcshortwave

    I was going to stay out of it, but had to address this. Deanne didn’t censor any of the posts; one of the people being rude and disrespectful had removed/blocked themselves from the group, hence, that person’s posts do not show up in the screen caps. If you will go back to the occupysa group wall, scroll *way down to find the original post/comments, you will see that person is back, and the nasty comments made are back in place.

    I had also managed to congratulate all for being divisive, disrespectful and downright rude to folks that actually supported and wanted to help, and also reminded them that the pettiness going on in that thread, and others, could be seen around the world.

    Get over your egos. It’s not about *you. It’s about everyone. Let’s show everyone the same respect that we are asking to be shown.

  • Anonymous

    The movement cannot say that they are against politicians in the pockets of corporations when several members of the group – KA, SK, KG, RP, MO, etc. make every effort to hide the local corruption and city councilman Bernal’s involvenment in hiding the theft/fraud from citizens/taxpayers.

    Crooked politicians are crooked politicians and the movement cannot make excuses for any of them just because a few persons/plants ( plant like  KA)  in leadership roles want to protect them.

    The movement will not gain support from mainstream san antonio, unions, other organizations when they have “leaders” who are in bed with our corrupt local government, police force, etc.

    A small group from the movement protested at Cornyn’s office. There were no masks and foolishness. They spoke well to the press and met with Cornyn’s reps.  This was the first positive thing I have seen since the movement began.

    Stop with the “we are taking over the world – masked man BS”. Concentrate on local issues that can help our citizens like the meeting with Cornyn’s staff. 

    Stop excluding people and threatening legal action against those who simply tell the truth – the truth certain “leaders” want to hide.

    thank you.  

  • Coffeyartist

    Respectfully, many more posts than just one person’s were deleted.  I posted on that thread personally, and none of my comments appear onscreen.

  • Anonymous

    It appears that she is deleting inappropriate comments – not content, ideas, suggestions, etc. There is a big difference.

  • Anonymous

    I applaud the  efforts to expose the corrupt core of persons who set themselves up as the “leaders” of a leaderless movement.

  • Techtease

    If any Facebook comments are not shown with these screen caps it’s because their comments were deleted, and/or they blocked my account. The main purpose for this posting was to present an example of an online discussion gone wrong. Mistakes offer opportunities for learning. Recognizing our mistakes sometimes can lead to positive results. I hope the Occupy SA park commune uses this as an opportunity to evaluate how people inside and outside Hemisphere park get and share information.

  • Anonymous

    The website listed is NOT the official website of the movement.

    OccupySA is not an Annonymous operation.  This site was created by Raye Penber – a 17 year old in a mask.

    Renber and his gang installed themselves as Admins on every site they can access so they can control ALL information, content, comments, etc.

    They do not speak for the movement or for our citizens.

  • Angelica Leandra

    This thread continued with over 80 more comments.  You’re just selecting certain sections to get your side.

  • Angelica Leandra

    The editing of this thread makes the whole point you’re making invalid.  Everyone agreed that the best way to get your question answered was to go to a General Assembly which I suggested several times.  You also removed the comment regarding the reply to post I put about materials needed and why we needed the money. I believe the reply was something about that stuff being needed for Haven for Hope, not for Occupy.  As I said before, I invite you to a General Assembly where you can find the answers to the questions you desperately seek for.

  • Redbeancookie

    The first post I saw from this DeAnne woman was her picking a fight. Literally, “You want to fight?” I assumed she was twelve. When I found out she was an adult, and that she represented the Media Justice League, I was appalled. Then, when I found out that she was the same hostile woman who wanted to divide us all by race, I was disgusted. Really, Current, you can do better than this. Surely this lady’s behavior is not met with your approval?

  • Redbeancookie

    You are not part of the movement. You are angry because you couldn’t rouse Anonymous as your personal army. Tell the truth, or STFU.

  • Plumcider

    Not true. Where is DeAnne’s post offering to fight other members? 

    Seriously, this is not a good lie for you to tell. Shall we take the actual screenshots and post them here, so that any readers here can be exposed to reality rather than this slanted fantasy this article has concocted?

  • Angry Toasters

    Although I didn’t participate in this particular conversation I followed every last comment. As a person with children and as a struggling small business owner, I dont have the luxury of running out to every meeting and GA being held or shutting down my business to camp out in the park. I rely very much on second hand information from other attendees and what is being reported back online (not much). I am sure there are many others like me who are still on the fence, still waiting to better understand what exactly the movement is trying to achieve, how they are trying to achieve it. We are people who really WANT to believe in this movement. Unfortunately the only thing being reported in the media is that there is a bunch of kids camped out playing drums at the park. So when I see someone asking legitimate questions on an online forum ( questions I myself had) and getting treated disrespectfully and told “Good Riddance” for no other reason that they express concern and interest in why things are being done the way they are, it is very disappointing. There was an  attitude from some of the members of “you weren’t there so you have no right to ask questions”. This is the best way to turn away other potential members of the movement.  Aside from the person under attack, Coffey and Alcocer were the only people involved in this mess that were trying to have a genuine conversation.  We’re not all going to have been there from day 1 and present at every meeting and gathering, and thats OK. Thats how it works. The idea is for the movement to grow. Thats what we want isn’t it? Although it probably wouldnt be fair to say the few people involved in this conversation are an accurate representation of the movement as a whole, as an outside observer it is very disappointing and some of the people involved in this conversation need to understand they are creating considerable damage to the image of the whole San Antonio movement.

  • Jakstiltskin

    “Rob Quijano You know this has already been addressed last night. Stop clogging up space, DeAnne. This is an important step for the group as we move forward. I am embracing it.
    DeAnne Cuellar Are you the V for Vendetta masked man Rob Quijano trying to ‘silence’ me? Or do you just want to fight with someone? I’ll fight I’ve got all day…

  • Redbeancookie

    This article wasn’t about presenting the truth–it is a smear campaign created by spoiled children who are unhappy that they did not get to take control of the group. They refuse to understand that we are individuals with different concerns, and we need no leaders.

  • Jakstiltskin

    Not true. You edited the thread to suit your slanted view, and it is obvious.

  • Tinman225

    Tell me that masked 17 year old Raye Penber/sodapop didn’t create the site occupysatx.com . YOU tell the truth and stop swearing at me.  

  • Tinman225

    BUT you have persons who appointed themselves leaders, censored comments, erased information, banned citizens who did not agree with them, etc.

  • Redbeancookie

    You mean the site you wanted so much to be a member of? The site you continuously whine about because they deleted your off-topic thread? That site? Yeah, I don’t know who created it, and I don’t care. What I do know is that your purpose here is entirely self-serving.

    And by the way, I’d still like you to STFU.

  • Redbeancookie

    We have no leaders, and no one was banned for not agreeing. They were ignored for being off-topic trolls.

  • Tinman225

    Ranting BUT not answering the question.

    OccupySA is NOT an Anonymous operation and is not run by little boys running around in halloween masks playing grown-up.

    OcccupySA is a movement by the People. 

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    yes. i should be said that mr. foddrill has one dog in this hunt: his allegations about misappropriation of funds at the city, which, as far as i can tell, were investigated and dismissed by the city (big surprise, perhaps), and that no other federal, state, or local agency has since been willing to open a file on despite (or because of?) his regular and nerve-rattlingly aggressive email campaigns. maybe – just maybe – if he didn’t demonize every politician, journalist, and protestor that didn’t see his way right off the bat, he could appropriate a portion of today’s enthusiasm/energy for change/justice to his ends. but given his own theatrics and widely slung insults it’s no surprise that anonymous and occupy have shied away from his desired endgame.

  • Redbeancookie

    Read slowly, and this time for comprhension: I do not know who created it, nor do I care. I do, however, know who you are, and you could care less about any occupy group. You are here for yourself. Stop misrepresenting.

  • Chriscraft1

    Raye Penber Acually, occupysatx and anon210 belong to g0nz. lol nothing
    belongs to you dude unless you paid for it :)

    Here is a facebook message from Penber/sodapop straight from the web stating that the movement does not own the site that is supposed to be their official website !

    Anonymous ( in this case 17 year old Raye Penber/sodapop) controls ALL information that the movement is allowed to see. 

    This is why WE neded a REAL website NOT controlled by little boys in halloween masks playing grown-up.

  • Chriscraft1

    We tell you over and over again harman that capcwfa is an organization of several membersand WE expose the corruption YOU refuse to.

    YOU have the proof of the criminal activity BUT use the SA current as YOUR personal forum to discredit all OUR proof to justify YOUR refusal to expose the crimes sto our citizens.

    a member of CAPCWFA

  • Chriscraft1

    harman- you have recent emails from Bexar County Constable Mark Vojvodich concerning the open investigation he has.  Are you calling his emails a lie ?

  • Chriscraft1

    “off topic” – any comment that does not support the views of the “leaders” in charge of the website.

  • Chriscraft1

    http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Verum-i-Libertas/292079567484112

    Read the City  email between city IT manager Jose Medina and city vendor Isabel Gonzaba where they conspire to add extra hours to time report invoices processed via the city Avaya contract.

    Read the Avaya invoice that shows auditor’s notes proving that the fraud went on for at least 4 years - stealing up to $200,000 from citizens.

    Review the CD that you have with other details of the crime.

    NOW- tell your readers that there were no violations of law covered up by our city government and the SAPD.

    thank you.  

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    Headline changed to reflect fact that no one has actually been “kicked out” of Occupy San
    Antonio.

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    he doesn’t work there. there is no investigation.

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    i did check into it.

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    several members that share the same computer? your isp is identical to tinman.

  • Chriscraft1

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Verum-i-Libertas/292079567484112

     

     

    Read the Municipal Integrity
    intake statements of former Telecom manager Jerry Galindo and veteran IT
    employee Joyce Garcia sating that the internal telephone billing account was
    misused.  Read the city email from
    Municipal Integrity manager Virginia Quinn to others including Deputy City Manager
    Peter Zanoni sating that for 25 years city departments were billed for untold amounts
    of goods and services for which they received no benefit. . Review the CD you
    have.

     

    Now read the statement from
    HUD OIG where they show that the city did an audit and said that they only
    misused $ 648 from 2004-2008 as it was applied to the radio account.

     

    Do you think the fact that the
    City did not mention the theft of $200,000 and the 25 years where ALL city
    departments were billed for an untold amount of goods and services might show
    that the city submitted a fake audit to Federal investigators in HUD OIG case #
    HL-10-0465 last year?

     

    We are meeting with staff
    members of Congressman Lamar Smith and are asking that the case be reopened and
    that criminal charges be filed for those who submitted fake financial documents
    to investigators in an effort to hide the fraud/theft.

  • Techtease

    I will be posting screen caps with ALL the comments in a few. Cheers.

  • Chriscraft1

    Mark S. Vojvodich

    Constable, Pct 3 Bexar County Police

    8918 Tesoro Drive Suite 301

    San Antonio, TX 78217

    Phone 210.335.4750 Fax
    210.335.4789
     

    MVojvodich@bexar.Org

    I just spoke with his office.

     

  • Chriscraft1

    We made a copy of your public reply that Constable Mark Vojvodich doesn’t work there and that there is NO investigation.

    As soon as we get a call back from him we will post his reply to your comments.

    Mark S. Vojvodich

    Constable, Pct 3 Bexar County Police
    8918 Tesoro Drive Suite 301
    San Antonio, TX 78217

    Phone 210.335.4750 Fax
    210.335.4789
    MVojvodich@bexar.Org

    Chriscraft132 minutes agoin reply to gharman harman- you have recent emails from Bexar County Constable Mark Vojvodich concerning the open investigation he has. Are you calling his emails a lie ? Flag
    Like ReplyReply
    gharman2 minutes agoin reply to Chriscraft1 he doesn’t work there. there is no investigation.
    Chriscraft132 minutes agoin reply to gharman harman- you have recent emails from Bexar County Constable Mark Vojvodich concerning the open investigation he has. Are you calling his emails a lie ?
    Flag Like ReplyReply
    gharman2 minutes agoin reply to Chriscraft1 he doesn’t work there. there is no investigation.

  • Techtease

    I will be posting screen caps with ALL the comments in a few. Cheers.

  • Chriscraft1

    There are millions of users with identical internet service providers.  SBC is a common provider in san antonio.

    we tell you that we are a group of citizens BUT you refuse to even speak with us and see for yourself.

    you do our citizens a disservice.

  • Nick

    The multiple Inaccuracies of your article are revolting. 

  • http://twitter.com/dcshortwave dcshortwave

    Ummm… I think that actually Deanne was kicked out of that group…. ?

  • Nick

    I have pointed out multiple Inaccuracies over Email. Thank you for addressing the issue. As I said previously this Blog was written by someone who is representing our movement falsely. Her claim that her friend’s facebook post was deleted or censored is false. Her claims that her friend was “kicked out” fales. Her claims that local Unions and other local movements have not reached out to us are false. We are a “leaderless movement” because we are a democratic movement we have an infrastructure where everyone who chooses to exercise their right to speak will be heard. We don’t need a charismatic leader or figurehead. We are the people. Yet again her claim to a lack of Infrastructure is false.

  • Rob

    There seem to be missing posts in this article. What are you censoring?

  • Nick

    John you are one of those people who loves to hear himself talk aren’t you?

  • Chris Caballero

      Come on Tech Tease, your slant isn’t even disguised. I’d expect much.much more from The Current but I guess even alt/indie rags can have their axes to grind.
      Instead of just throwing the following line out for every one to see you should explain why they believe this way. You wrote,’Social Justice leaders within the Bexar County are were skeptical of the ‘leaderless’ crowds.’ Instead of questioning just the leaderless movement why don’t you question those local Social Justice Leaders as to why they are skeptical. You see a few did show up and they did offer to lead OSA but they came with baggage and goals of their own. When they were asked to participate as individual people they refused. It was basically we play with their ball their way or they would not participate. They have chosen to not participate. That is nothing but self centered selfishness and these are supposedly our best local Social Justice Leaders, I certainly hope not. Actually the actions and selfishsness of these Social Justice Leaders shows exactly why a leaderless movement needs to be explored and operated as a theory geared towards operational actuality. They showed they could care less about the movement, they wanted the power.
       You proceed, ‘A good friend of mine donates her time and money all year long to help local community groups.’ and add,’ Like so many, she joined one of the Occupy San Antonio Facebook groups to ask a simple question. Why did the Occupy San Antonio General Assembly apply for a DBA (doing-business-as) trade name? The question she posed, and the discussion that followed, was not welcomed.’ It looks to me that a total of six people are involved in the discussion, including DeAnne Cuellar. Now lets assume the other 5 were really out to get her, which is certainly not the case, but lets just say it was true. And your point would be????? Oh yes I see that 5 people ganged up on DeAnna Cuellar for asking a question, what about the 3500 plus people who are members of either the Occupy San Antonio group page ot he Occupy San Antonio community page. So your gonna throw a whole movement under the bus for an ‘ EDITED INTERPRETATION’ of a conversation between six people. Are you kidding me? So if I get six of my friends and we start loading the Current site with White Power trash and ideas would that make  the Current a White Power Magazine, of course not. To do so would be absolutely crazy. Your site is wide open as is the OSA site and as such is vulnerable to any thing and everything controversial. Then there is the ‘A friend of mine’ problem. You are personally involved here, you obviously have strong thoughts, beliefs, and feelings for DeAnna Cuellar. You have bestowed upon her equally stong values and morals. That is a mistake and you know it.You have obviously also sat at length with her and allowed her to vent and/or relay her message. You even took screen shots from her without asking for screen shots from OSA. Also did you sit at length with anyone in media from OSA? What exactly did you do to vet DeAnna Cuellars story to you, or did you even think to do that? Sounds like you just decided to take her word and view for it, and why wouldn’t you considering the way you feel about her. If any of this is even half true then you did not fulfill your objective duty to this story. You did however fulfill your duty to your friend. I guess that’s good enough huh?

    Chris Caballero

  • Tinman225

    not john

    why be so rude ?

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    sorry: ip address.

  • Chris Caballero

    Hey Tech Tease do me a favor and  please tell me why my post was removed from this non-censoring forum? All that righteous-nous from you and then you turn around and delete/remove my comments, or is The Current just wonky. Thats alright pplenty of people saw it and now know that The Current is just as dangerous and hypocritical as any other newspaper.  

  • Chris Caballero

    I guess The Current is just wonky. I stand embarrassed and corrected I obviously see my original post. Please fix that while I remove my foot.

  • Clean Truth

    The Current has been duped. This article and forum are being abused by John E. Foddrill Sr. as a validation piece for his ongoing slander against ANONYMOUS and OCCUPY! San Antonio. “Tinman225″ is John E Foddrill Sr. He was terminated as San Antonio’s Telecommunications Manager in 2006. He filed suit contending that the City terminated his employment in violation of the Texas Whistleblower Act. The jury charge asked, “Did John Foddrill, Sr. make a good faith report of a violation of law?” The Jury answered “NO.” The trial court (57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2006-CI-06702) entered a take nothing judgment based on a jury’s findings. In short, he received no MONEY. Foddrill subsequently appealed the decision. The 4th Court Of Appeals heard the case and subsequnetly AFFIRMED the trial court’s decision. He appeared at a General Assembly of OCCUPY! San Antonio and made his speech that demanded that the OCCUPY! movement dump our focus in favor of his personal tragedy, his proposition was voted down. He currently is flaming the Occupy San Antonio board with ridiculous claims that ANONYMOUS and OCCUPY! San Antonio are aiding and abetting a cover-up of corruption in San Antonio gov’t.   SEE http://www.4thcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/htmlopinion.asp?OpinionId=23124

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    that is: the officer who had an investigation is no longer there. i’m waiting on callback, but my understanding was the thing had been spiked.

  • Clean Truth

    CAPCWFA is the organization founded by tinman225 aka Chriscraft1. it has 1 member masquerading under several aliases… John E. Foddrill Sr who is angry because the General Assembly of OCCUPY! San Antonio voted down his demands that they and ANONYMOUS acts as his personal army. I’s just him pursuing his personal agenda to get PAID OFF for whistle blowing in 2006 that a jury decided was bullshit, and the 4th Court of Appeals AFFIRMED. LULZ!

  • http://www.sacurrent.com/ gharman

    i do understand that. and that being said: he is free to post on our site like everyone else. i am also open to pursuing another possible story, but at this point i need at least one agency with an open investigation to assuage my many other concerns. the current tries to maintain a website for free-wheeling discussion in
    the belief that communication can foster deeper levels of mutual
    understanding, and even result in a healthier culture for it. (such as my hope is for this thread.) that said, practices like posing under multiple handles as several different users to “game the system” would be a violation of our posting policies. allegations of the sort foddrill makes frequently border on libel. and he’s prone to post repeatedly on a story for no other reason that to spread a link to his whistleblower site. these are all questionable practices under the terms of our online posting guidelines. thanks, all.

  • http://twitter.com/tllanes Tricia Llanes

    Wow.  What a hotbed.  Lots of points (some more cogent than others) made by all sides and the result is: *HEADSPIN*

  • Lionman75

    Why post lies when you have no proof that tinman is John ? Is it so hard to believe that a group of citizens joined together to form Citizens Against Public Corruption Waste Fraud and Abuse ? Is it so hard to believe that we meet, discuss information we collect, post comments under our own handles, etc ?

    We have a meeting room with internet access and a library of documents proving the corruption – no one has ever asked to see it or speak with any of us- they just lie and lie and lie.


    The court sided with the city – Yes. The appeal failed- Yes.

    The judgement was arrived at because city attorney Deborah Klein and attorney mark Kosanovich coached city witnesses to lie and hide the many crimes that John reported. The judgement is void as it was arrived at via fraud by an officer of the court- the attorneys involved.

    We knew that the appeal would probably not be granted as attorney Malinda Gaul never prserved the error and never objected to anything. It is only a step in the process that was necesaryunder the law.

    John made no demands of anyone.  He was asked if he wanted to address the 2nd meeting group and did so. He handed out up to 100 disks of information.  There was no vote of any kind. Not one person objected to anything he said.

    At a time when evidence of city councilman Diego Bernal’s involvement in the illeal acts to hide the crimes came to light Raye Penber took steps to protect Bernal and hide the evidence.  He was joined by other Bernal supporters.

    John was banned from the website and defamed by members of the group for his efforts to expose the crimes against our city.

    The dishonest leaders of the movement who control access to information refuse to inform the other members of the reports of corruption and of Bernal’s involvement in the criminal activity.

    Members of capcwfa support John and we continue to work at exposing the crimes and cover-up.

    Look at some of the documents we are reposting after an entire forum was deleted to hide the evidence:

    http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Verum-i-Libertas/292079567484112

    The SA Current has a copy of the CD that has two files on it:

    Perjury of varn and Klein – proving the subornation of perjury,aggravated perjury and fraud upon our judicial system by the city. Varn’s 2007 deposition, Ciy Administrative Directive 6.12, the City Charter and other documents show that Varn lied under oath in court by presenting an entirely fabricated testimony to hide decades of corruption, theft, fraud, etc. . The disk has pages from his deposition and court testimony proving his lies.  The court never saw his deposition as to this date it hs been kept secret by the City, malinda Gaul, Kosanovich, Klein, Bernard, Judge Arteaga, SAPD, etc. as it proves his lies- a felony.

    Theft of Public Funds- a City email proves that IT manager Jose Medina and city vendor isabel Gonzba added extra hours to time report and approved the fake invoices. Avaya invoices prove that the theft went on for about four long years with over 250 seperate counts of mail and wire fraud.  Up to $200 K was stolen form citizens. This is another felony.

    The statute of limitations is tolled as city officials, SAPD and others conspire to hide the crimes. The statute of limitations only begins to run from the time of the last criminal act to hide the crimes against our citizens and Federal government. The fact that the city submitted a fraudulant audit to HUD Fedral inspectors last year in case # hl 10 0465 , the recent crimional acts of Bernal to hile the crimes, recent statements by Chief McManus that there are no crimes comitted, etc.just started the statute of limitations over again.

    Ask harman to post the CD for citizens to see.

    lionman75 – a memberof capcwfa  

  • Lionman75

    see our reply posted by lionman75 – a member of capcwfa.

    Clean truth is not telling the truth. John made no demands. John was asked if he wanted to speak to the 2nd meeting group He did so and passed out about 100 disks of information.  There was no vote and no one objected to anything he said. Members voiced support and offered assistane in getting the information posted on the net for all to see.  

  • Lionman75

    I know that John E Foddrill Sr was kicked out. Leaders stated that they were getting lawyers and cops after him.  

    Members of capcwfa welcome the cops to investigate and welcome attorneys who want to sue John and us for simply telling the truth and providing evidence from the City’s own files to support our claims.

  • Bladerunner7

    Hello, I also have two jobs and am unable to attend the General Assemblies as often a I would like. I have, however attended enough to know both John Fodrill and DeAnne Cuellar enough to know that the San Antonio Current was duped. First of all, DeAnne was upset her ideas were not agreed to during the early GA’s. She subsequently stopped attending the meetings and started trying to undermine the movements decisions from without through posts on Facebook  by questioning their honest intentions, starting a different Occupy web page and trying to siphon members to it, as well, through PR, as evidenced by this blog and it’s heavily edited   copy of posts. As for John Fodrill, I have seen his “evidence” and if it’s not conjecture and speculation, it’s personal as he’s been banned from the premesis of city council. I have tried talking with John, but besides his bullish nature he also seems a little “unstable”. He seems obsessed with something which is not exactly there, and once you disagree with you he accuses you of conspiring w/ Councilperson Bernal and a bunch of others, and keeps sending the same pictures of letters he claims are indisputable. Even here, he has put multiple posts under different names with his claims (hello chriscraft1 and tinman225). He’s slandering people. It is a shame to see this young fledgling movement with so many hopeful people, being so easily damaged from the outside by two people who play unfairly, when they do not get their way. 

  • Lionman75

    Again – clean truth is not telling the truth. He cannot prove any of his statements about our group as he has never visited us, spoken to us or tried to verify how many members we have in capcwfa. 

    No vote was taken to vote down exposing decades of public and law enforcement corruption as the leaders of the movement do not want the “sheep” to learn of the crimes against our city or how city councilman Bernal is helping hide the crimes.

    The LULZ shows that this is an Anonymous member trying to keep Bernal protected from exposurewith more lies.   

  • Lionman75

    Seems like someone is not telling the truth. We have this in our files –

    haha! i’m sure greg abbott
    will be right over. here’s a suggested outrage for your next fit of electronic
    campaign: “Harman tells Foddrill to suck on the ass hairs of a
    menstruating armadillo. Foddrill still banned from sacurrent.com.”  

    – email of April 25, 2011
    from SA Current Editor Greg Harman to Citizens Against Public Corruption Waste
    Fraud and Abuse founder John E. Foddrill Sr. 

     

  • Bladerunner7

    Come on John. Knock it off please. You are doing more harm than good with your slandering. Anybody can be a facilitator at any of the GA’s. You know this. 

  • Lionman75

    — On Wed, 9/7/11, Vojvodich, Mark
    wrote:

    From: Vojvodich, Mark
    Subject: RE: Express News article – County doesn’t need additional constables
    To: “John E. Foddrill Sr.”
    Date: Wednesday, September 7, 2011, 9:53 AM

    Thanks for note. Do
    you have a time we can meet and discuss these cases and what follow-up we can
    do?

     

    Mark

    Mark S. Vojvodich

    Constable, Pct 3 Bexar County Police

    8918 Tesoro Drive Suite 301

    San Antonio, TX 78217

    Phone 210.335.4750 Fax
    210.335.4789

    MVojvodich@bexar.Org

  • Lionman75

    You won’t sit down with us and refute our reports because you have had all the proof you need in hand since the day you became the Editor of the Current BUT you refuse to speak with us.

    This is the same tactic that Occupy San Antonio is using. They simply call us names and call us liars BUT offer no proof that we lie or offer no evidence contrary to refute our reports.

    They banned John to hide the facts just like you did when you banned John instead of taking one minute to met and hear him out, review the tons of evidence, etc.

    Read the files Perjury of varn and klein and theft of public funds. Review the many certified letters to the City and to Bernal asking questions that any citizen can ask to which we get no replies. Then give us a call.

    capcwfa

  • Huitzitziltzin

    its very clear that this entire “issue” has become a pissin’ contest. it must be nice to have friends in the right places to defend you the second you need to shut someone up.
     yes youre talented, yes youre qualified, yes youre very smart ppl but come on…all of this is just causing more harm than good. at the end of the day it doesnt matter how big your ego is, how many protest youve attended, how many pics you have of yourself up on facebook @ these protests,  or honestly how much money you donate- what matters is if you live up to what you claim. stop bitching and bullying people and open your selfish eyes. our city will never see progress when our “leaders” are acting in such ways. get over yourselves.

  • Kitbashjay

    Actually we never banned John. I have invited him out to GA multiple times but he says hes afraid he will be arrested if he goes out in public. I tried to be nice and he smeared OSA and myself across the board with violent and volatile e-mail and face book campaigns. He has accused anyone he has come in contact with of hiding the truth should they not immediately agree with him. IMHO he shows the signs of a paranoid schizophrenic.

  • Kitbashjay

    Seriously dude, do you not know what a cease and desist order is? Keep it up and I will be seeing you in court. Slander is not acceptable.

  • Lionman75

    NO violence by John. Cite ANY violent act . You can’t.

    John was banned from all Occupysa and Anon sites in san antonio administered by Anon/Bernal supporters.  He is defamed by these persons in an effort to discredit his information.

    The name calling is a tactic used by anyone who cannot refute the evidence presented showing that Bernal is helping the CFity hide crimes against our citizens.

    If one cannot show that the messenger is lying they defame the messenger.

    John  told the group from the time of the second meeting that he would no be atending any public rally as he didn’t want to give SAPD any excuse to arrest him. Now with threatening phone call to his home  at 3:01 AM on Oct 12 and threats on facebook he surely will not meet in public with Anons and Bernal people.  He has offered to meet in a private place including his home BUT this is not what they want.

    The comment below about a cease and desist order ( no order has ever been issued- just an idle threat) is a prime example of how Foddrill is treated. He is threatened on this board with a cease order and a lawsuit- not a sign that he is welcome !

    “Seriously dude, do you not know what a cease and desist order is? Keep it up and I will be seeing you in court. Slander is not acceptable. ” -Kitbashjay    

    He is not welcomed by the leadership of OccupySA as he is a threat to them when he exposed Bernal and our corrupt city government.

    We slqnder or libel no one. We tell the truth- the truth OccupySA/Anon leaders want to keep secret.

    member of CAPCWFA

  • Lionman75

    Spoken like one of the little boys in masks runing around pretending to be in control of the movement.

    There is NO cease and desist order issued as you never got one or have any grounds for one. Just an idle threat by a little boy using big words.

    You can meet us in court any day your momma and daddy drive you down to the courthouse. 

    When you get into high school you may learn more about big words that you don’t understand. 

    Written defamatory statements are libel NOT slander.  

    Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation. Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a printed or fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.

  • Lionman75

    not John/ chriscraft is a member of capcwfa.

    You and kitbashjay need to stay in school and learn more about slander and libel. Slander involves public speech and we never spoke to you or the other little boy -BUT you run around in masks so we can’t say for sure.

    Membres of capcwfa including John suggested that the movement focus on more specific local events of corruption, constitutional violations, Texas Open meeting violations, etc. but information we presented was banned as leaders want to protect Bernaland the City. You made a deal with the devil.  

    The media critizes the movement as when anyone is interviewed they read from a manifesto touting long complicated slogans making no sense to the average citizen.  If it weren’t for Bernal and our city government wanting to hide the lawlessness from the public the movement might focus on events that they could understand.

    Your leaders, Bernal and the City can’t allow this to happen.

  • Tinman225

    Meghan Owen/ kitbashjay
    ;

     

    You
    threatened John sayings that you went to the cops and to an attorney. You call
    him mentally unstable.

    You joined
    John as a fellow member of the media group and were sat right next to John for
    a few hours during the second meeting BUT can render an opinion that he is
    mentally unstable?  You are an unemployed
    person with her arm in a sling BUT make medical observations after just a
    couple of hours observing a person? What did he do during the few hours you sat
    next to him that made him appear mentally unstable?

    You joined
    the media group with John and never objected to anything he stated about the
    corruption and fraud against our citizens when he was asked if he wanted to
    address the group.  You know that there
    was NO vote the night of the 2nd meeting concerning protesting against the
    corruption. You heard many people support his efforts to expose the corruption
    and theft of citizen’s money for many many years.  You have the CD he gave you proving the crimes
    and cover-up.

    Quit lying
    Megan Owen. Quit threatening John with arrest and a lawsuit as we do nothing
    wrong.

    Meghan Owen/kitbashjay – members of capcwfa are sending all your hateful emails to the media and the current so they cansee how occupysa threatens citizens who simply tell the truth- the truth you want to keep hideen fraom the movement and the media.

    you shouldn’t use your email name on this board and then give others your email address .

    Megan Owen/kitbashjay is a member of OccupySA media group . Ask the current to post her hateful, threatening emails so the world can see the real face of the movement. 

    member of capcwfa

  • Tinman225

    Megan Owen/kitbashjay;

    we thought your name seemed familiar.  You are a member of the OccupySA media group having joined the group during the second meting when John Foddrill sat next to you as he joined the media group as well. You gave John your email address along with the other membrs of the group. we have the entire list sent to John by the group. You and John spoke to each other, proided some background on yourselves and joined in the discussion for a few hours.  Nothing out of the ordinanry happended and you gladly accepted a CD with prooof of the corruption with no objection. When he was asked to speak to the group you never objected and there was never a vote NOT to expose the corruption as you know.

    Everything changed when the finger was publicly pointed at Bernal afer the 2nd meeting.

    Why ?

    Why call John names now and remark that he is unstable ?

    Other than expose Bernal and our corrupt government what has he done to you and OccupySA ?

    You nor OccupySA ever got a cease and desist order and won’t as you have no grounds and don’t want to go to court and let John and CAPCWFA expose the truth to the world. You are an unemployed woman with her arm in a sling making idle threats against John.

    Sounds like OccupySA is really a nice place ???

    not with people like you in it .  

    member of capcwfa

  • Kennedysnutz

    Did you all see the March today? Maybe you should revise this and eat your words Tech Tease. There were hundreds of locals, including many local movement builders and local unions. People are people and no one person represents this movement so how can u blame occupy san antonio for a couples words and freedom of speech?

  • Tinman225

    Megan Owen:

    Here are some comments from YOUR official site.: 

    Daniel Patrick Roche Also, I would really like to ban Foddrill. The guy is either
    disturbed or the most thoroughly committed troll I’ve ever encountered. He’s
    essentially migrated to trolling here after being booted from all the
    individual City Council members’ official and personal pages. That sort of
    thing could easily be done if we actually centralized all online communication.

    Kassandra Allbright ‎Daniel Patrick Roche > I’m with you on Foddrill. I actually
    thought he had been banned. :(

    Elonifer Skyhawk I listened to him and watched some vids he linked to.
    Communication with him did not seem to be coherent or even stay on his own
    topic. I find no credibility in anything he is saying at this time….

    Kassandra Allbright It’s not out job to provide Foddrill with the kind oh *help* he
    really needs. That’s entirely his responsibility. He only seeks to distract,
    and must go.

    §  Rosa Martinez
    Diego knows about him and police man
    officials have records on him he is A LOCAL LOON! I know hes reading this and
    sir I think you should back off because u are walking the thin line to
    harasment there is such a thing as cyber bulling and YOU ARE BULLYING ME AND
    EVERYONE ELSE IN THAT STATEMENT!

    Rosa Martinez
    JOHN I HAVE TOLD YOU ONCE TWICE I LOST
    COUNT! YOU NEED TO STAY ON POINT AND THIS HAS CONTINUED FOR TOO LONG AND IM
    DONE YOU ARE COUNTER PRODUCTIVE TO THIS MOVEMENT AND YOU ARE NOT US! YOU ARE
    NOT US! YOU ARE NOT US!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE NOT US! YOU ARE NOT US! YOU ARE NOT
    US!!!!!!!!!!YOU ARE NOT US! YOU ARE NOT US! YOU ARE NOT US!!!!!!!!!!

    October
    9 at 12:37pm · LikeUnlike ·

    4 peopleLoading…

    Leti Guerra
    NOT ONE OF US. NOT ONE OF US.

    October
    9 at 12:38pm · LikeUnlike ·

    2 peopleLoading…

    Raye Penber
    YOU ARE NOT US!

    October
    9 at 12:40pm · LikeUnlike ·

    3 peopleLoading…

    Mhmm Johnny
    Let’s not get out of hand here…

    October
    9 at 12:41pm · LikeUnlike

    Rosa Martinez
    HE IS OUT SORRY I HAD TO CUT THE FEED TO
    THE TROLL

    October
    9 at 12:42pm · LikeUnlike ·

    4 peopleLoading…

    Alyda Asmodeus
    HERE HERE, *BLOWS WHISTLE* NOT ONE OF US!!!
    NOT ONE OF US!!!!

    October
    9 at 12:43pm via mobile · LikeUnlike ·

    2 peopleLoading…

    Rosa Martinez
    THANK YOUUUUUUUU

    October
    9 at 12:43pm · LikeUnlike ·

    2 peopleLoading…

    Rosa Martinez
    AWW SHIT MY WHISTLE BROK

    October
    9 at 12:43pm · LikeUnlike ·

    2 peopleLoading…

    Rosa Martinez
    PFFFFT PFFTRF PPFFFFT

    October
    9 at 12:44pm · LikeUnlike ·

    2 peopleLoading…

    Rosa Martinez
    SO PHASE 2 HUH HUH HUHHHHH????

    October
    9 at 12:44pm · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

    Kassandra
    Allbright Phase two

     

    Meghan Owen – We are sending copies of your emails where you threatened legal action and going to the police to the Current and local/national media .  Your emails and online comments do NOT show tht Occupy San Antonio is open to all citizens and everyone can have a voice in the local movement.

    You hide the crimes against our citizens instead of exposing them.

    This is NOT what the Occupy movement is about.

    member of capcwfa

  • Tinman225

    San Antonio Police Department case # SAPD 11261976 was created by Officer Soto badge # 9739 concerning the life threatening phone call of 10/12/2011 3:01 AM when a computer generated voice like/or that of Anonymous threatened citizens of San Antonio, Texas.

    The ATT Annoyance Call Bureau was contacted with the case #, etc. and a complaint was filed referenceing the criminal complaint filed with the SAPD.

    References to email, facebook and internet site threats were also referenced in the complaints. Occupysatx.com, Operation Southern Thunder facebook page, occupy san antonio facebook page, occupy san antonio facebook page, etc. are referenced.

    The phone call crossed State/international lines and the internet is involved in the illegal activity. The FBI has been contacted and the Dallas FBI has responded.  As ususal the San Antonio FBI ignores the reports.  

    capcwfa

  • Freespeecher222

    CALL SAN ANTONIO CITY COUNCILMAN DIEGO M BERNAL (210 207 7040) AND ASK HIM WHY HE WAS CONSPIRING WITH OCCUPY SAN ANTONIO AND ANNONYMOUS
    IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT.
     

     ASK
    HIM FOR COPIES OF HIS COMMENTS THAT HE DELETED. SUBMIT FOIA REQUESTS FOR THESE
    COMMENTS AND ALL OTHER FACEBOOK COMMENTS INCLUDING COMMENTS HE POSTS AND THEN DELETES
    SO AS TO HIDE HIS CLANDESTINE COMMUNICATIONS WITH THESE GROUPS UNDER THE COVER
    OF DARKNESS.  
     

    http://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/OccupySanAntonio/    OCT. 18, 2011    approximately 10 am
     

     

    Kevin Gonzáles I was posting about Occupy San Antonio and they took it down.
    Wtf.

    9 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Bubba Ridgeway wonder when they’re turning off facebook. message it to me
    and I will post it tomorrow :)

    9 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Kevin Gonzáles Ok

    9 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kevin Gonzáles I can’t send messages either. WTF

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kevin Gonzáles Let me guess John Foddrill reported me. It was just a video
    and article about the Occupy here.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kevin Gonzáles The march also on the 15.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Rebecca
    Coffey Oh that sneaky Foddrill. Trickster that he
    is!

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    2 peopleLoading…

     

    Rob Quijano Really Diego, if only you had bought one of those pen
    drawings he caries around. Lol

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Kevin Gonzáles I’m part of it and they paid me off, So says Foddrill. Sad
    man.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

    Rebecca
    Coffey lol!

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kassandra Allbright Whew! Hope I blocked him in time.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Kevin Gonzáles ‎^Lulz. Kassandra
    Allbright we can go eat some where good. Let me know when you get your
    check.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kassandra Allbright You bet, Kevin! As log as they serve hummus, I’ll be happy! ;)

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Kassandra Allbright ‎*long

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

    Kassandra Allbright ‎Diego M. Bernal> Do you think Foddrill could pose a
    threat now that he’s been called out in such a public (for him) manner?

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Kassandra Allbright No, he didn’t! Diego!!!!!

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Rob Quijano I hope somebody doesn’t cut and paste this conversation. More
    headaches. Lulz

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Kassandra Allbright I’m just afraid of his paranoid butt showing up at your
    office to cause trouble since he blames you for so much…nothing.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Kassandra Allbright lulz

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Joseph Blandford Foddrill is a moron

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    2 peopleLoading…

     

    Kassandra Allbright Um, delete our posts?

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kevin Gonzáles Everyone that shuts him down he throws them in the mix. This
    happened in 2006 get over it and move on.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kassandra Allbright Um, I care about you and don’t want any harm to come to your
    person, or your staff…

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kassandra Allbright Can’t you notify the authorities?

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    1 personLoading…

     

    Joseph Blandford Foddrill is stupid. However if he where that stupid he would
    have big problems. I would Imagine the SAPD would make short work of him.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike ·

    3 peopleLoading…

     

    Kassandra Allbright Okay, Diego.

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

     

    Kassandra Allbright Have to wrap some stuff up for the night. Back a little
    later. Hugs to all! :)

    8 hours ago · LikeUnlike

  • Freespeecher222

    Some BUT not all of San Antonio Councilman Diego M Bernal’s comments showed up today on facebook. 

    Bernal and members of Occupy San Antonio and Anonymous believe that 30 years of public corruption is funny and joke about it.  I wonder IF Bernaal would laugh if it was his  money that was stolen NOT millions of tax dollars?

    http://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/OccupySanAntonio/
    OCT. 18, 2011

    Kevin
    Gonzáles I was
    posting about Occupy San Antonio and they took it down. Wtf.

    Bubba
    Ridgeway
    wonder when they’re turning off facebook. message it to me and I will post it
    tomorrow :)

    Kevin
    Gonzáles Ok

    Kevin
    Gonzáles I
    can’t send messages either. WTF

    Diego
    M. Bernal It
    means someone reported you or a post of yours as a violation of FB policy. It’s
    an auto-response.

    Kevin
    Gonzáles Let
    me guess John Foddrill reported me. It was just a video and article about the
    Occupy here.

    Kevin
    Gonzáles The
    march also on the 15.

    Diego
    M. Bernal
    Probably. He did the same to me.

    Rebecca Coffey Oh that sneaky Foddrill. Trickster that he
    is!

    Rob Quijano Really Diego, if only you had bought one of those pen
    drawings he caries around. Lol

    Diego
    M. Bernal The
    transaction would have added to the paper trail of the 30 year criminal
    government cover up I’m a part of.

    Kevin
    Gonzáles I’m
    part of it and they paid me off, So says Foddrill. Sad man.

    Diego
    M. Bernal I’ll
    put your check in the mail.

    Rebecca Coffey lol!

    Kassandra
    Allbright Whew!
    Hope I blocked him in time.

    Diego
    M. Bernal Your
    check is also in the mail.

    Kevin
    Gonzáles
    ‎^Lulz. Kassandra
    Allbright we
    can go eat some where good. Let me know when you get your check.

    Diego
    M. Bernal Fly,
    monkeys.

    Kassandra
    Allbright You
    bet, Kevin! As log as they serve hummus, I’ll be happy! ;)

    Kassandra
    Allbright
    ‎*long

    Kassandra
    Allbright ‎Diego M. Bernal> Do you think Foddrill could pose a
    threat now that he’s been called out in such a public (for him) manner?

    Kassandra
    Allbright No,
    he didn’t! Diego!!!!!

    Rob Quijano I hope somebody doesn’t cut and paste this conversation.
    More headaches. Lulz

    Kassandra
    Allbright I’m
    just afraid of his paranoid butt showing up at your office to cause trouble
    since he blames you for so much…nothing.

    Kassandra
    Allbright lulz

    Joseph
    Blandford
    Foddrill is a moron

    Kassandra
    Allbright Um,
    delete our posts?

    Kevin
    Gonzáles
    Everyone that shuts him down he throws them in the mix. This happened in 2006
    get over it and move on.

    Diego
    M. Bernal Sure
    he could. I’ve thought of that. Comes with the job, I guess.

    Kassandra
    Allbright Um, I
    care about you and don’t want any harm to come to your person, or your staff…

    Kassandra
    Allbright Can’t
    you notify the authorities?

    Joseph
    Blandford
    Foddrill is stupid. However if he where that stupid he would have big problems.
    I would Imagine the SAPD would make short work of him.

    Diego
    M. Bernal
    Everything is fine.

    Kassandra
    Allbright Okay,
    Diego.

    Kassandra
    Allbright Have
    to wrap some stuff up for the night. Back a little later. Hugs to all! :)

     

  • http://blogs.sacurrent.com/?author=32 Fashionation

    Great response!